ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SRAP-BASED GENETIC DISTANCE AND HETEROSIS FOR FRUIT WEIGHT AND HARVEST TIME IN TOMATO

ASSOCIATION BETWEEN SRAP-BASED GENETIC DISTANCE AND HETEROSIS FOR FRUIT WEIGHT AND HARVEST TIME IN TOMATO

A. SYAHIDAH, R.H. MURTI, A.B. SETIAWAN, and A.A. ALHAMAWI

Citation: Syahidah A, Murti RH, Setiawan AB, Alhamawi AA (2026). Association between SRAP-based genetic distance and heterosis for fruit weight and harvest time in tomato. SABRAO J. Breed. Genet. 58 (3) 1030-1039. http://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2026.58.3.8.

Summary

Accurate heterosis prediction is essential for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) hybrid breeding. This study evaluated heterotic effects and parental genetic distance (GD) using open reading frames (ORF)-targeted sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) markers, assessing their correlation with agronomic traits. Six parental genotypes’ crossing used a North Carolina II design, with F1 hybrids evaluated in a randomized complete block design. Hybrid H2 exhibited the highest heterosis for fruit weight, achieving 181% mid-parent heterosis (MPH) and 173.3% best-parent heterosis (BPH). Maximum GD (Nei = 0.183) occurred between P1 and P5. Notably, GD correlated significantly and positively with fruit weight per plant (MPH: r = 0.713; BPH: r = 0.742) but negatively with harvest time (MPH: r = –0.733; BPH: r = –0.742). These findings suggest that SRAP-derived GD is a reliable predictor for fruit weight and harvesting time in tomato breeding.

Tomato (S. lycopersicum L.), heterosis, genetic distance, correlation, SRAP, yield-related traits

This study indicates that using SRAP-based genetic distance can help choose parents to create tomato (S. lycopersicum L.) hybrid with high productivity and early maturity.

Download this article

SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics
58 (3) 1030-1039, 2026
http://doi.org/10.54910/sabrao2026.58.3.8
http://sabraojournal.org/
pISSN 1029-7073; eISSN 2224-8978

Date published: June 2026

« Back to main page of SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics Vol. 58 No. 3

Comments are closed